Although this would work just as well if instead of Rome we put [insert name of republic here], but note Cicero says “No new Rome.” Cicero’s Republic is always the first source on policy for all republics.

This excerpt from Cicero’s speech against agrarian law, which Cicero deems  the most important  of his speeches, carried such weight because Roman agrarian legislation was the reason for the fall of the republic.

He gave this speech upon the first day of his ascension to consulship, when the republic was at it’s height. He overturned the law, and defeated the legislation. Pompey would later overturn the republic to gain it in the Lex Julia.

VIII. In fact, if we look round to survey everything which is pleasant and acceptable to the people, we shall find that nothing is so popular as peace, and concord, and ease. You have given up to me a city made anxious with suspicion, in suspense from fear, harassed to death by your proposed laws, and assemblies, and seditions. You have inflamed the hopes of the wicked; you have filled the virtuous with alarms; you have banished good faith from the forum, and dignity from the republic.

[24] Amid all this commotion and agitation of minds and circumstances, when the voice and authority of the consul has suddenly, from amid such great darkness, dawned on the Roman people; when it has shown that nothing need be feared; that no regular army, no band of extempore ruffians, no colony, no sale of the revenues, no new of command, no reign of decemvirs, no new Rome or opposition seat of empire, will be allowed to exist while we are consuls; that the greatest tranquillity of peace and ease will be secured; then, no doubt, we shall have much reason to ear that this beautiful agrarian law of yours will appear popular.

[25] But when I have displayed the wickedness of your counsels, the dishonesty of your law, and the treachery which is planned by those popular tribunes of the people against the Roman people; then, I suppose, I shall have reason to fear that I shall not be allowed to appear in the assembly, for the purpose of opposing you; especially when I have determined and resolved so to conduct myself in my consulship, (and the duties of the consulship cannot be discharged with dignity and freedom, in any other manner,) as neither to desire any province, nor honour, nor dignity nor advantage nor anything whatever which can have any hindrance thrown in its way by any tribune of the people.

[26] The consul states, in full senate, on the calends of January, that if the present condition of the republic continues, and if no new event arises, on account of which he cannot with honour avoid it, he will not go to any province. By that means I shall be able, O conscript fathers, so to behave myself in this magistracy, as to be able to restrain any tribune of the people who is hostile to the republic,–to despise any one who is hostile to myself.

-Cicero, On the Agrarian Law

Originally posted 2007-08-31 21:29:07. Republished by Old Post Promoter

Money, in the system of symbols, has no meaning. Gold, on the other hand, does. Gold is eternal. It never tarnishes. But when this symbol gets perverted in to money, when the public gets corrupted, …it leads to a fall. This symbol is on the back of the republic because republics are also eternal; the ship of state is and can be programmed to sail forever.

Likewise, if a republic gets corrupted by money, if it is sold of as money, Cicero warns us in his speech De Lege Agraria, then it warns of an immanent fall.

When gold replaces the people as the base of the Republic (or anything for that matter – slaves, black gold), then the state of affairs poses a threat not only to its very foundation, but its whole purpose can be bent and perverted.

“A republic which is not just is not a republic,” Cicero writes in his book by the same name. Rome had this problem. And we could listen more to the lessons of Cicero.

For it is from Cicero that we learn money corrupts government. If Caesar had not been assasinated to please the great statesman, we would also have learned from him that absolute power does not corrupt absolutely – in the hands of a statesman, both are alchemical.

Originally posted 2008-02-16 14:04:17. Republished by Old Post Promoter