History isn’t over. The simulacrum just hasn’t rewritten itself yet. If it doesn’t make any sense to you that Hegel sasaid doesn’t make sense to you, we need to revaluate the idea and understanding of what history is.
What is history? Is it a fact by fact accounting, writing it would be an undertaking that would involve an infinite number points. What is the singularity?Technology is not history, but a choice. [grab this from other post]
Fancy footwork like no other, can even show now is the future (simulacum)
Now is not just history’s end. Didn’t make it any longe. But the future must be reknewed and enough momentum to thrust us into a new epoch, the simulacum restored to its proper glory. But wiill the future look liek the past? As Jason Moghagheh said to me, “We must make new images.”
[Hyperlink: According to the most integral theoriest on the topic, the next phase in our evolutionary history is a global information age, but is the agrarian state even realized?
Although the vanguard took up the campagin so many years ago that we're reaching,s orry it took us so long, being esoteric. we were somewhat delayed by augustine, 2007 and but the shit of state has carried us nonethelss.
Now is the future but as I pointed out with the vanguard, there is the ship of state has carried us this far, dropped us on the shores of a sivler devestation. If I had returned, the time is now [algoithms]. My rhetoric has been eneded as much as ever, to fix the corruption fo the information in people’s minds. With true undestanding comes the enlightnement.The renaissance must necessarily be a revival fo the classical knowledge ew
For with the launch of an afterculture, histoy certainly isn’t done being played, not even by a republic. And we are a republic. “It is the end of the univese, and you’re all blogging.” Doctor Who, Utopia [could def sub in article on singulaity and 2012, or combine parts and categorize them into two
Of couse, this is exactly the thing that wills ave us. (communication). Now. For at last democracy can take its holy place in the republic. replcing black gold, and making a just republic [for a republic which is not just is not a republic] Platonic ideal is fulfilling itself, the epbulic is now possible.
First we must use to learn our republic. In our unbalanced system, teh president has the right to veto, 48t in rome, it was the tribute of the plebs with this right. The office was won only afte the people walked out of rome, leaving the city to the nobilites or senetes, but empty of people. So this was a Rome with a people stronger than us. More educated than us. They demanded a republic with checks and balances.
Their voting system also was unequal, as more votes were denominated to the senatroes because they were supposed to vote for the republic. but overr time the system became corrupt. Now, with the internet, we have not just the pwoer to vote electronically, but the power ot come together democratically on line wihtout fighting ove whose what (to see if one makes hte people, democacy, the base, replacing the point of necessity posed to the republic like cars) with a republic/mixed constitutional system in cotnol to check democacy’s tendency towads dictatory.
In a dialectic discussion, it would seem as if the vanguad is moving frm the republic, agaian to gobal infomational. THe civlization continues to build itself, so tht we can go on thinking questions like consciousness, and adding to the collective wall of science. Who knows what 24th and 25th centuy string technology will look like? Accorrding to fukuyama, njeither islam and religion nor communism are going to be dialectical victors. ANd yet the past continues to play out.
Originally posted 2007-11-17 11:00:15. Republished by Old Post Promoter

St. Paul stole the ideas from Cicero, but although the form is familiar, the meat of them could not be more different. While Cicero, evokes “terror” of the flame and the sword besieging the republic, Paul pillaged his techniques not for the integrity of the republic but to the detriment of suckers.