Archive for the Category »Uncategorized «

Exordium

The grand forces of chaos and order are currently in conflict trying to come to a balance and this tension will be resultant in (hopefully, and by that we mean Hopefully, and not like with extra hope, but in the Hobbsean fashion of capitolizing Ideas) this website, which will be (welcome to Now, wherein you get to see my grand designs for the Future) a site for bringing Cicero into the Present.

Oh, and if you’re one of my friends looking for me, my new cellie is…oops, I just lost it.

And if you’re an employer looking for my resume, email me for the password.

Originally posted 2006-12-26 19:17:49. Republished by Old Post Promoter

Geometry and the Looting of the Republic

I was talking to a geometrician this weekend, and the conversation had interesting implications for our system. If you thought that our country’s education system was bad due only to lack of funding, think again. The problems began with the crusade on geometry in the 1920’s, 30’s, and 40’s. Likewise, the deeper problems within our system do not necessarily reach back to the inception of civilization itself with civilizations like Babylon.

History was not intended to go this way. Christianity was hijacked forty days after its inception, just as Neal Stephenson asserts, but it was hijacked from Rome.

LucretiusSt. Paul stole the ideas from Cicero, but although the form is familiar, the meat of them could not be more different. While Cicero, evokes “terror” of the flame and the sword besieging the republic, Paul pillaged his techniques not for the integrity of the republic but to the detriment of suckers.

Meanwhile, Augustine actually wrote his City of God right over Cicero’s Republic (note the similarity of titles: The usage is not accidental – Augustine was actually using Cicero’s geometrical margins for his own purposes without the knowledge of how to do it himself), a fact that wasn’t discovered until the 18th century, when the forgery was discovered and the work was reinstated, not as a piece of superstition or metaphysical rhetoric, but as a guiding force for our civilization.

Likewise, Descartes’ proof of god, for example, is very disappointing to read, at least for the enlightened eye. It’s all “there was a mountain, and triangles,” but the proof is not well-rounded, and in fact is just rhetoric. The current disdain for proofs of god that stemmed from that is disturbing.

Cicero was a big proponent of an educated populace until he despaired of the fickleness of the public towards the republic. However, in this country the government not only realized that education was the stepping stone to enlightenment, but they took away the primary keys. Geometry was the first to go.

The current basis for teaching math, including calculus, has no basis in how math is supposed to be taught. All enlightened concepts correspond to math, and any enlightened person can easily understand math and mathematical concepts almost instantaneously. That is because they work from the concept to the formula, rather than the other way around.

For over two millennia, Euclid was the de facto geometry teacher. Why? Because in his enlightened state he invented the methodologies, and thus was the perfect person to introduce them. Becoming enlightened is difficult enough when exposed to the proper educational and mind-opening processes. Moreover, much of our symbolic body is comprised of geomtetrical symbols (the pyramid and the eye, for example); geometry is fundamental to both the world and our minds, and no doubt this is why it was the first thing to go.

Not only can’t the lack of education continue, but in fact it is one of the key components to a proper democracy, as the Athenians well knew. Moreover, those who are not properly educated (lead out) are misled, and their entire persons go awry, and lack sustainability.

To have an entire country purposely mis-raised to be slaves bodes questionably for posterity, as an educated populace is one integral aspect of a true democracy. Moreover, an actual conspiracy against education on this scale cannot be tolerated, and perhaps the best way to oppose the trend of ignorance in this country is to begin again at the beginning, with the reinstatement of geometrical learning tools like Zome “toys,” multi-dimensional geometrical modeling pieces.

Originally posted 2007-06-12 06:52:38. Republished by Old Post Promoter

Don’t season a fall

Although this would work just as well if instead of Rome we put [insert name of republic here], but note Cicero says “No new Rome.” Cicero’s Republic is always the first source on policy for all republics.

This excerpt from Cicero’s speech against agrarian law, which Cicero deems  the most important  of his speeches, carried such weight because Roman agrarian legislation was the reason for the fall of the republic.

He gave this speech upon the first day of his ascension to consulship, when the republic was at it’s height. He overturned the law, and defeated the legislation. Pompey would later overturn the republic to gain it in the Lex Julia.

VIII. In fact, if we look round to survey everything which is pleasant and acceptable to the people, we shall find that nothing is so popular as peace, and concord, and ease. You have given up to me a city made anxious with suspicion, in suspense from fear, harassed to death by your proposed laws, and assemblies, and seditions. You have inflamed the hopes of the wicked; you have filled the virtuous with alarms; you have banished good faith from the forum, and dignity from the republic.

[24] Amid all this commotion and agitation of minds and circumstances, when the voice and authority of the consul has suddenly, from amid such great darkness, dawned on the Roman people; when it has shown that nothing need be feared; that no regular army, no band of extempore ruffians, no colony, no sale of the revenues, no new of command, no reign of decemvirs, no new Rome or opposition seat of empire, will be allowed to exist while we are consuls; that the greatest tranquillity of peace and ease will be secured; then, no doubt, we shall have much reason to ear that this beautiful agrarian law of yours will appear popular.

[25] But when I have displayed the wickedness of your counsels, the dishonesty of your law, and the treachery which is planned by those popular tribunes of the people against the Roman people; then, I suppose, I shall have reason to fear that I shall not be allowed to appear in the assembly, for the purpose of opposing you; especially when I have determined and resolved so to conduct myself in my consulship, (and the duties of the consulship cannot be discharged with dignity and freedom, in any other manner,) as neither to desire any province, nor honour, nor dignity nor advantage nor anything whatever which can have any hindrance thrown in its way by any tribune of the people.

[26] The consul states, in full senate, on the calends of January, that if the present condition of the republic continues, and if no new event arises, on account of which he cannot with honour avoid it, he will not go to any province. By that means I shall be able, O conscript fathers, so to behave myself in this magistracy, as to be able to restrain any tribune of the people who is hostile to the republic,–to despise any one who is hostile to myself.

-Cicero, On the Agrarian Law

Originally posted 2007-08-31 21:29:07. Republished by Old Post Promoter

Global problems a sign for global movement

The scientist who,  first warned Congress about global warming twenty years ago,returned on June 28 to say, not only are his warnings as true now as then, but that we’re approaching a “tipping point,” after which the effects of global warming will be irreversible.

“The difference is that now we have used up all slack in the schedule for actions needed to defuse the global warming time bomb. The next President and Congress must define a course
next year in which the United States exerts leadership commensurate with our responsibility for
the present dangerous situation.”

What a sad state of affairs that we’re faced with two presidents, the Democrat supported by all the industries that are trunking out (corn, and coal if you believe him it still has a way to go) or a Republican candidate who stands for oil, the state of affairs which has brought our state to such a precipitous pass. The New York Times agrees, with articles such as Are Big Oil and Big Coal Climate Criminals?

City-states like New York, where the temperature rises precipitously in August who’s mayor’s have little allegiance to the Republic, may consider greening their roofs, as in this case study in Hong Kong. Since I wrote those words yesterday, record numbers are saying they want to see a local response, meaning their already writing off the rest of the country for survival’s sake.

Washington dares actually posing a threat to national security, according to this article from Columbia University’s Earth Institute. Members of Congress have been briefed on this report. Meanwhile, their continued war to control the world’s energy supplies brooks a threat to our civilization on a global scale.

We need not be reminded it took us countless thousands of years to get here, and here we are, at the singularity, an important projection of our conscious global evolution[picture of pyramid with line coming out of top, subtitled " what is the point of civilization?] , and the United States government seems finds the decimation of our species acceptable.

Originally posted 2008-07-07 22:24:25. Republished by Old Post Promoter

Does the government have the right to legislate morality?

Most people don’t realize the truth in morality, until they become enlightened. They don’t understand there is a need to be moral, when they cannot hear the furies torment you. Samsara threatens when you think a wrong thought, if you step off the path.

It is the duty of the wise to guard the more foolish, and many do not know the reason to be moral, and think it is okay to be shiesty.

Is it is the duty of leaders to be representatives for morality? Certainly we want them to be moral in their political decisions. But is not what is done in the privacy of your own home, your business?

Certainly it is illegal to beat your own child, but this is because it is a crime against another citizen, and are we not all citizens?

Does this give the right to life people a start?

According to the scientifically divine wisdom of the ancients, when their vast and mighty civilization was at an intellectually advanced state, the republic (a mixed constitutional system, balancing the elements of kinship and oligarchy with those of democracy, in a rule for the people, by the people) does not have jurisdiction over your private life, because it is outside of the public sphere.

This brings up a problematic conundrum with respect to a republic as opposed to a democracy. Technically, voting is undemocratic; if the the majority is allowed to decide for the minority, it is mob rule, or ochlocracy, democracy’s opposite, according to my Columbia History professor, Richard Billows. And if the minority aren’t served, then you can have an injustice.

Thus we must be mindful of this in issues such as abortion. If the fetus is judged to be not yet alive, then it is still a woman’s right to choose. This is a big choice, and one that politicians are forced to navigate.

However, in the public sphere, it is the wise who traditionally ruled, and received more votes because they would cast theirs for the interest of the republic, having been enlightened as to its nature, and its basis on a foundation of good. Their knowledge also gave them the wisdom to judge political issue morally, defining the boundaries of the law.

Past this line at which we have judged it acceptable for politicians to legislate morality, we have another type of morality, at which they must be moral in their decision not to step over.

Originally posted 2008-09-07 13:04:29. Republished by Old Post Promoter