Archive for » 2009 «

Don’t season a fall

Although this would work just as well if instead of Rome we put [insert name of republic here], but note Cicero says “No new Rome.” Cicero’s Republic is always the first source on policy for all republics.

This excerpt from Cicero’s speech against agrarian law, which Cicero deems  the most important  of his speeches, carried such weight because Roman agrarian legislation was the reason for the fall of the republic.

He gave this speech upon the first day of his ascension to consulship, when the republic was at it’s height. He overturned the law, and defeated the legislation. Pompey would later overturn the republic to gain it in the Lex Julia.

VIII. In fact, if we look round to survey everything which is pleasant and acceptable to the people, we shall find that nothing is so popular as peace, and concord, and ease. You have given up to me a city made anxious with suspicion, in suspense from fear, harassed to death by your proposed laws, and assemblies, and seditions. You have inflamed the hopes of the wicked; you have filled the virtuous with alarms; you have banished good faith from the forum, and dignity from the republic.

[24] Amid all this commotion and agitation of minds and circumstances, when the voice and authority of the consul has suddenly, from amid such great darkness, dawned on the Roman people; when it has shown that nothing need be feared; that no regular army, no band of extempore ruffians, no colony, no sale of the revenues, no new of command, no reign of decemvirs, no new Rome or opposition seat of empire, will be allowed to exist while we are consuls; that the greatest tranquillity of peace and ease will be secured; then, no doubt, we shall have much reason to ear that this beautiful agrarian law of yours will appear popular.

[25] But when I have displayed the wickedness of your counsels, the dishonesty of your law, and the treachery which is planned by those popular tribunes of the people against the Roman people; then, I suppose, I shall have reason to fear that I shall not be allowed to appear in the assembly, for the purpose of opposing you; especially when I have determined and resolved so to conduct myself in my consulship, (and the duties of the consulship cannot be discharged with dignity and freedom, in any other manner,) as neither to desire any province, nor honour, nor dignity nor advantage nor anything whatever which can have any hindrance thrown in its way by any tribune of the people.

[26] The consul states, in full senate, on the calends of January, that if the present condition of the republic continues, and if no new event arises, on account of which he cannot with honour avoid it, he will not go to any province. By that means I shall be able, O conscript fathers, so to behave myself in this magistracy, as to be able to restrain any tribune of the people who is hostile to the republic,–to despise any one who is hostile to myself.

-Cicero, On the Agrarian Law

Originally posted 2007-08-31 21:29:07. Republished by Old Post Promoter

We don’t have a State

We have a state of affairs.

Originally posted 2008-04-16 20:37:54. Republished by Old Post Promoter

The Heads of State

The Heads of State

The Heads of State

Simulacrum in Philosophy

The simulacrum has long been of interest to philosophers. Although I stumbled upon this concept myself, it has a long and distinguished lineage, including Plato, Nietzsche, Deleuze, and Baudrillard, of which I am only the latest.

Last but not least, indeed, the concept comes full circle. For the simulacrum is the model of history itself (and a properly non-linear one). It is fitting that the concept the philosopher’s who launched it, hacked it, and later during WWII were despondent about it (Baudrillard lamented the end of history), now rises anew: for with the singularity, history can be reborn.

Nietzsche himself represents philosophy coming full circle since Plato; he is a dialectical antithesis, taking up the reigns of the arguments of Glaucon and Callicles in Plato’s Republic, playing chaos to Plato’s order. Indeed, he represents the decay, or break down of philosophy, a sign that it is completing a lifecycle (and ready to be born anew.

Wikipedia sums up the lineage of our discussion on this philosophical topic, the simulacrum. This will be useful to you integral theorists who are trying to grasp how the simulacrum fits into all this:

In his Sophist, Plato speaks of two kinds of image-making. The first, faithful reproduction, attempted to copy precisely the original. The second distorted intentionally in order to make the copy appear correct to viewers. He gives an example of Greek statuary, which was crafted larger on top than bottom so that viewers from the ground would see it correctly. If they could view it in scale, they would realize it was malformed. This example from visual arts serves as a metaphor for philosophical arts and the tendency of some philosophers to distort truth in such a way that it appeared accurate unless viewed from the proper angle.

Nietzsche addresses the concept of simulacrum in The Twilight of the Idols, suggesting that most philosophers, by ignoring the reliable input of their senses and resorting to the constructs of language and reason, arrive at a distorted copy of reality.

Modern French social theorist Jean Baudrillard argues that a simulacrum is not a copy of the real, but becomes truth in its own right: the hyperreal. Where Plato saw two steps of reproduction — faithful and intentionally distorted (simulacrum) — Baudrillard sees four: (1) basic reflection of reality, (2) perversion of reality; (3) pretense of reality (where there is no model); and (4) simulacrum, which “bears no relation to any reality whatever.”

Baudrillard uses the concept of god as an example of simulacrum. In Baudrillard’s concept, like Nietzsche’s, simulacra are negatively perceived, but another modern philosopher who addressed the topic, Gilles Deleuze, takes a different view, seeing simulacra as the avenue by which accepted ideals or “privileged position” could be “challenged and overturned.”

Simulacra are in fact, the model we collectively use for our reality. If we’re revealing the symbol now, that’s pretty apolcalyptic. Cicero uses it as the model for the republic, and after hearing my Cicero professor mention it a number of times in class, I was surprised when he greeted my paper topic with the question, “What is the simulacrum?”

My first piece to answer him, I felt, did not do his question justice. And so, I used the simulacrum to historiography my history of Rome. My reviewers wrote, “Professor Billows thought you were doing something new, using the simulacrum as an analytical tool,” the head of the History Department at Barnard wrote in her revivew, referring to the head of the Ancient Studies Department at Columbia. “He said, ‘there she does something which isn’t just what you’ll find on the better modern literature on the topic.”

For more on the import of this, check out Simulacrum and Singularity, in which it is expounded how we should NOT despair, for these world wars are indeed the dialectical argument of the republic playing itself out, and until we will learn the lesson of the republic (in doing so, we will learn how to bring the wisdom of the last age into the next one), thus launching the next epoch.

Actually, maybe that article relates it to the launch of the next aeon.

Originally posted 2007-09-09 23:39:03. Republished by Old Post Promoter

Spitzer Outed for Ousting Federal Mortgage Scam

Yup, Spitzer’s fall came right after he ousted the federal government in the Washington Post for interfering in state’s abilities to combat the mortgage crisis.

According to Satcha,  (in a comment since conveniently deleted from The Washington Post, quoting that paper itself the true reason Spitzer was busted for prostitution (and then judged by his hypocrisy), is because he came out with his dirt on the federal government

This is why Patterson is whipping out his dirt before it can be used to blackmail him should he get out of hand. After watching Spitzer’s credibility destroyed, who could blame him? With the perfect aplomb of a statesman, he has levelled the playing field (but he still has the advantage.

Originally posted 2008-03-27 03:17:18. Republished by Old Post Promoter